07 February 2009

Théâtre du Soleil : Collaborative Company

The following is text from a Wikipedia.org entry for Le Théâtre du Soleil which I co-authored and edited earlier this morning. I gained an affinity for and intimate knowledge of Le Théâtre du Soleil while I studied abroad in Paris, France at L'Université de Paris - Nanterre | Paris X from 1999 to 2001, during which time I had the great honor to participate in a Peking Opera/Shakespeare Workshop with Taiwanese master of contemporary Chinese Opera, Wu Xing Kuo and a practical theatre studies organization tied to the company: L'Association de Recherche des Traditions de l'Acteur (ARTA), at the Cartoucherie in the Vincennes district of eastern Paris.

I also had the important, life-affirming opportunity to participate as an audience member
in Le Théâtre du Soleil's production of Tambours sur la Digue (May, 2000), a performance which in essence defined my own personal, elaborative penchant for theatrical spectacle and opulence on stage, presented in the forms and textures of elaborate costuming, expressive make-up design, corporeal/dance theatre traditions and a somber, sparse, though ultimately very spiritually and visually inspiring scenic design. I include this text as personal record of my contributions today to Wikipedia.org and to document my profound passion for this performance group and for its uniquely exceptional and innovative, universal form of collaborative, improvisational theatre.
THÉÂTRE DU SOLEIL
A COLLECTIVE COMPANY OF THEATRE ARTISTS

Le Théâtre du Soleil (lit. "The Theater of the Sun") is a Parisian avant-garde stage ensemble founded by Ariane Mnouchkine, Philippe Léotard and fellow students of the L'École Internationale de Théâtre Jacques Lecoq in 1964 as a collective of master theatre artists devoted to the pursuit of a universal, truly popular form of multi-cultural corporeal theatre based on improvisation, masks and pantomime.

Mnouchkine and her international company of actors believe that the fundamentals of theatre and theatricality are found within the traditions of Asian theatre and the popular historical theatre of the West, as defined by the Jacques Lecoq course of study. Le Théâtre du Soleil is a relatively young cosmopolitan company (taking into account the long, storied history of Parisian French Theatre) that is located at La Cartoucherie, an old munitions factory complex in the Vincennes area of eastern Paris.

The company creates new theatrical works, focusing on collective work and devising new collaborative creative processes based on corporeal theatre and improvisation; its main purpose, unchanged since 1968, is to inspire a new relationship between the theatre and the public and to be distinguished from théâtre bourgeois, creating a more popular, transcendental, universal form of theatre.

THE SOCIALIST ENSEMBLE: A COMMUNITY OF EQUAL CITIZENS
The company was, at its inception, a very unique vibrant phenomenon, quickly becoming one of the major, most-reputed companies on the international contemporary theatre landscape. It built its own "socialist" ethics, based on the concept of a theatre company as a tribe or a family, a community of equal citizens: everyone receives the same wages, and the workday follows a schedule to which all actors, musicians and production assistants rigorously accommodate. More original still, the final casting or distribution of roles for all productions is decided upon only after all the performers in a production improvise, practice and audition numerous (if not all the) roles.

Le Théâtre du Soleil is truly a contemporary ensemble theatre company; no principal roles or lead actors are defined in its productions, which are written to showcase the beauty and mastery of theatrical talent of the entire cast of actors/performers. Hélène Cixous, a famed French feminist author/philosopher, has been associated with the company as its preeminent, principle playwright since the late 70s or early 80s, penning the vast majority of the company's recent productions through a collaborative process, which develops through the improvisational exercises of the performers during any 9 to 12 month rehearsal period for a production. This organic writing process lends itself to productions of extended length, sometimes ranging between 3 and 6 hours in duration.

THE "FOURTH WALL": BREAKING THE THEATRICAL ARTIFICE
Le Théâtre du Soleil's productions are often performed in unconventional venues such as barns or gymnasiums, as Mnouchkine does not like being confined to a typical stage. Similarly, she feels theatre cannot be restricted with the "fourth wall". While the official native stage of the company is a typical "fourth wall" proscenium/thrust stage, the theatre space is marked by specific communal innovations, like open seating (i.e., without reservations), an expansive music space (stage-right) devoted to the live orchestrations of the company's principle composer & solo musician (i.e., Philippe Léotard), and a large open lobby or social space where audience and actors alike convene before, after and during intermissions of each show to enjoy refreshments & conversation.

When audiences enter a Mnouchkine production, they have the opportunity to peek through holes in the large, canvas curtain separating the audience space from the actor space, to observe the actors preparing (i.e., putting on make-up, getting into costume, practicing vocal & movement exercises, etc.) right before their eyes. Sometimes, the troupe develops ideas out of improvisational exercises. They also incorporate multiple styles of theatre in their work - ranging from commedia dell'arte to Eastern forms such as Butoh, Noh, and Bunraku (i.e., a Japenese "puppet form in which life-size puppets act out dramatic narratives to music").[1]

PERFORMANCE IN PERSPECTIVE: Tambours sur la Digue, 1999
Les Tambours sur la Digue (en. "The Flood Drummers"), a production commemorating the turn of the Millennium in 1999-2000 and the flooding in China of vast, inhabited acreage to reroute waterways and make way for the nation's largest water reservoir that annihilated countless cities, villages, cultures and archaeological treasures, was performed in a contemporary adaptation of the classical Japanese Bunraku and Chinese Shadow Puppet traditions and featured performers costumed entirely in black who "manipulated" the colorful life-size human puppet-performers that danced around on stage. One particular trio of performers, living the role of a Chinese stilt-walker on the river's edge, amazed audiences during this production by balancing an animated, costumed actor on two 4.5 meter stilts. The puppet-actor could be seen actually dancing between the tall wooden, mobile poles, hoisted up & suspended by the "manipulators" dressed in black.


To deepen the sense of spectacle for the production, the stage design (e.g., a blank, universal space that was often adapted into a "digue" or wooden dock) featured a realistic, massive flooding at the end of the play, when human actors dived into the water and waded chest deep and where smaller hand-puppets representing the characters of the play were thrown into the water, left to float as if drowned in the flood.[2] The production also featured a live, full-stage percussion orchestration that succeeded in its full potential to profoundly move the audience to catharsis (see YouTube.com Video: "Theatre du Soleil Tambour").

PERFORMANCE IN PERSPECTIVE: Les Ephémères, 2006
Their latest work called Les Ephémères is an eight-and-a-half-hour long show that takes place in the space located between 2 sets of bleachers, forming a thoroughfare where performers roll on mobile scenic constructions & stagings to present small scenes of a few minutes each in length, played by as little as one or two performers. Some scenes are related; some are connected only by the thread of the memory, and some are replayed and fast-forwarded. The ephemeral temporal feeling of the scenes stays imprinted in the memory of the spectators, creating an eerie feeling and a deep sense of dream-stasis.

Several short intermissions are offered, during which actors serve unique, home-made appetizers and beverages to the audience members in the communal space or lobby of the theatre. Le Théâtre du Soleil even has its own resident "cuisinière" who has lived and worked devoutly with the company since the early 80's. Mostly sold out, the production is now touring around the world and can be seen in countries such as China, Japan, Argentina, Brazil, Spain, Germany and Canada. The large troupe travels with their original stages, their own sets, formidable amounts of costumes & props, and the company even takes the numerous children of the performers along with them, internationally. Le Théâtre du Soleil is truly the realization of a Socialist, popular ideal in the theatre!

A CITATION: CURRENT THEORETICAL ANALYSIS by A. Kiernander
For a thoughtful, literary, analytical discussion on Mnouchkine and her Théâtre du Soleil, included below is an extended citation from the major piece of literary theory on this theatre company and its director, Adrian Kiernander's Ariane Mnouchkine and the Théâtre du Soleil. The following text is a good introduction to Ariane Mnouchkine as a director and provides a valuable comparison between this female pioneering, innovative director and her influential predecessor: theatre arts/acting theorist and reputed director of the Théâtre du Vieux-Colombier, Jacques Copeau, whose theoretical works only appeared posthumously. Unlike Mnouchkine, who benefited from much acclaim and renown during her forty year career, Copeau experienced relatively little theatrical success during his lifetime.
Like Copeau's, Mnouchine's vision of the theatre is based on the ideal of a collective company of equals working closely together over a long period of time, collaborating jointly on the creation of performances. Both directors have had a parental role within the group and have tended to assemble companies of actors who are young, idealistic, and dedicated. Both directors also see the troupe functioning as a school for its members, who are not professional actors engaged for a specific production. [...] Copeau's ideas and aspirations as set out in his Appris coincided remarkably with what Mnouchkine was trying to achieve. In particular, Copeau's aim to rediscover the techniques of improvised theatre was vitally important, and along with it went an interest in the forms of commedia dell'arte and clowning. The two traditions, which Copeau and his actors experimented with, were to be the direct basis of two major productions by the Théâtre du Soleil, as well as informing much of its subsequent work. Mnouchkine has explored these aims of Copeau more completely and for a longer time than he himself was able to do in his lifetime.

Both Copeau and Mnouchkine have a penchant for working in large open performance spaces, and both have used the idea of the tréteau, the traditional raised wooded stage of French fairground performers, implanted within a larger acting space. The recreation of pictorial sets in favor of the more architectural use of permanent structural materials, like concrete, provides other parallels. A photograph of the interior of the Vieux-Colombier showing prominent roof-beams and skylights above an open acting space without wings has a quite striking resemblance to the fixed features of the interior of the Cartoucherie.[3]
CONCLUSION - COMPARISONS & REFERENCES: The Copeau Double
This introduction to Kiernander's text, a volume in the series Directors in Perspective of Cambridge University Press, publishers, August 2008, succinctly describes Mnouchkine's persuasions and accomplishments as a director, and rightly explains the prominence and repute of the Théâtre du Soleil. The use of the tréteau is evidenced by previous discussions in this article on various specific performances by the contemporary French theatre company. Also, the Socialist bent of this innovative theatre tradition of Mnouchkine and Copeau is explained both in this cited text and in previous discussions in this article. The Kiernander introduction also discusses the relationship and influences of such reputed theatre arts theorists and directors as Jean Vilar and Antonin Artaud, with their likely protégé: Mnouchkine. This Kiernander text is highly recommended as supplemental, integral reading when approaching the study of the Théâtre du Soleil.

REFERENCES
  1. ^ Don Rubin, ed. World Encyclopedia of Contemporary Theatre: The Americas, p. 180 [Paperback]. Taylor & Francis, 2000. http://books.google.com/books?id=Oct-fCGUBpkC&printsec=frontcover#PRA1-PRA180,M/, (7 Feb. 2009).
  2. ^ Ariane Mnouchkine, dir. Les Tambours sur la Digue. [Theatrical Performance] Le Théâtre du Soleil, 1999. http://www.theatre-du-soleil.fr/ (7 Feb. 2009).
  3. ^ Adrian Kiernander, Ariane Mnouchkine and the Théâtre du Soleil, pp. 4-5 [Paperback]. Cambridge University Press, August 2008. http://www.cambridge.org/ (7 Feb. 2009).
AUTHOR/EDITOR OF WIKIPEDIA ENTRY (7 Feb. 2009)
Matthew Blanchard
http://qherekidsf.blogspot.com/
San Francisco, CA 94109 USA
[February 07, 2009 @ 01:06PM]
So, that is my co-authored/edited entry into Wikipedia.org for Le Théâtre du Soleil. This text should give any reader an astute, comprehensive understanding of the concepts that underlay the formation, repute, and success in perpetude of this innovative, collaborative, universal form of theatre. To summarize, I will state that Le Théâtre du Soleil is a contemporary popular, collaborative theatre company that was founded on the practices and mastery of improvisation, corporeal theatre and the work of the ensemble; in the larger majority of its innovative and oppulent theatrical productions, throughout its forty-year history, the company has commonly borrowed from popular, Western, traditional theatre forms and from theatrical traditions of Asia, to create a uniquely original, impressively stylized form of performance.

Giving to the similarities between the pioneering, innovative director, Ariane Mnouchkine and her predecessor, Jacques Copeau, Le Théâtre du Soleil can be defined as a collaborative, "Socialist" performance troupe that shares common standards of equality, devout idealism, and mastery of technique amongst its members to create a close-knit, family or tribal community where the director plays the parental role, mentoring and teaching her team of young, enthusiastic actors. This philosophy or standard of practice has proved time and time again to engender and realize splendid, spectacular works of theatrical perfection, where catharsis is common ground for the performers and spectators alike.

I was profoundly moved by my expereinces with Le Théâtre du Soleil and ARTA at the Cartoucherie in Paris. I only hope one more day in my short, tumultuous life, to have the opportunity and honor again of participating in one of their ground-breaking, riveting performances as an audience member. I once was invited by Mnouchkine herself to audition for this theatre company, fresh after performing a monologue for the Peking Opera/Shakespeare Workshop at ARTA, but that opportunity was hampered and blocked by my good-intentioned though stingy father, who preferred I not stay in Paris long enough to be able excel through the company's collaborative, improvisational audition process.

My hopes & dreams were dashed; but alas, dreams are born again with new lives , new passions and new awakenings! This astounding, beloved contemporary French theatre company has touched my life once already and provided me with immense amounts of inspiration. I only hope that I can live until the day when I see that inspiration reborn in another pivotal, life-altering experience or through intellectual and artistic learning. That is my hope; that is my aim, and that is the profound sentiment of objective mission and goals that Le Théâtre du Soleil has given me in my experiences with them. I wonder if I will ever be able to repay my indebtedness as well as I am able to reflect upon it. We'll just have to wait & see...

Full of nostalgia & pride,
Matt(e)o | QHereKidSF
Matthew D. Blanchard
San Francisco, CA 94109 USA
[February 7, 2009 @ 06:05PM]

IF ONE ADVANCES CONFIDENTLY IN THE DIRECTION OF HIS DREAMS,
AND ENDEAVORS TO LIVE THE LIFE HE HAS IMAGINED, HE WILL MEET
WITH SUCCESS UNEXPECTED IN COMMON HOURS.
— Henry David Thoreau

23 January 2009

W&M = Princeton Review 3rd Best Value!!

The following is video footage from MSNBC.COM of Today's feature broadcast on the Best Value Universities in the Country, amongst which my Alma Mater, The College of William & Mary ranks third for public institutions. I wanted to feature this video and comments from an article I posted to my LinkedIn® College of William and Mary Alumni Network Group page from the W&M News website, entitled "W&M Featured on Today as a Princeton Review Best Value," by Brian Whitson, W&M News; January 9, 2009.

Meredith Viera, "msnbc.com video: 2009's best value colleges."
MSNBC.COM Today : News on the Economy, (January 8, 2009).
Retrieved on January 23, 2009 at 12:12AM PST.

The comments from other members of my LinkedIn® Group Network were strikingly negative. Many people had a lot of really awful things to say about the state of affairs at the College of William & Mary today, and about the changes that have taken place in the administration of the faculty, students, facilities and financial aid system in the past ten to twelve years. Although, a few of the remarks were positive, I was rather disappointed by the negativity of the majority of the comments as I originally intended in posting this article to the Group Page to strike a cord of pride amongst Alumni members of the groups, not adamant, vehement negativity.

The first comment to the article, which I responded to immediately after its posting, is listed in its full text here below. I was struck my the snide aloofness and snobbery of this comment that I had to respond myself; in effect, emphasizing my integral pride in my Alma Mater and my faith in its admirable reputation and immense, unique history & traditions. I'll follow the text of the first comment with my own response.
Something about this just strikes a nerve.
As an alumni, I look back and see how much W&M has become such a "catch-all" institution over the last 8 years or so since I graduated and how much it was moving inthat direction even while I was there. A friend of mine and I recently visited the campus, and it just feels like it's lost that "unique" something that made it the "public ivy school" that it is considered. Now its getting to the point where it has so many programs and offerings that there is nothing that really sets it apart from any other state-funded school, other than it's "rich history." I sort of liked when the school had more stringent standards of admission, more focused ona liberal arts degree, and it felt like it meant something to be part of the privileged theat were chosen to attend. With the shift in strategy and direction, it just feels like another school now, to the point that its a "best value." Just smacks of a retail & sales strategy.
It's not Walmart; it's the College of William & Mary.

David Brin,
"W&M featured on Today as a Princeton Review Best Value!: Comments"
LinkedIn® College of William and Mary Alumni Network Group,
(January 13, 2009). Retrieved on January 23, 2009 at 12:33AM PST.

In regards to David Brin's comment 40 (or so) mins ago:

I remember quite well that when I applied for William & Mary undergraduate way back in 1997, the College was also then ranked highest amongst public universities in the nation: Number One Small Public University, by the US News & World Report. So things haven't changed much, except that W&M is climbing in its rankings.

I still believe that the College holds the same stature and reputation for being a forbearer of all things good about the public liberal arts university education, albeit it's history does make it unique.

I was just remarking in a message to my W&M Alumni/Faculty Connections on LinkedIn® sharing the article with them, that the College has far different a reputation on the West Coast as it does on the East Coast. Had I stayed on the East Coast upon graduating from W&M in 2002, I would have easily been employed by a top notch organization or business, but alas, I chose to venture out to the Fog City (i.e., San Francisco, CA) to start anew, and few employers then recognized my outstanding, sterling academic credentials when I was first looking for work.

Californians are all about CAL and Stanford and USC and UCSD and UCLA; they don't pay much attention to things happening on the East Coast, and they certainly don't value deep-seeded history of old ivy league (or "public ivy league") institutions of higher learner. They focus on the new...on frontiers...on innovations. A liberal arts degree from the number one small public university in the nation doesn't mean much in the eyes of the West Coast employer.

That's just a matter of fact, and where I'm stuck now in my career development path. The transition or continuation into a graduate level of study will be an important decision for me, based on the California university that I am able to attend, because that academic credential will be regarded as highly important by potential West Coast employers.

That's just a little of my two cents and my experience! Thanks for your comment, David. I'd simply say, "Buck Up!" And Have still some profound pride in the stature and reputation, the character and aplomb of your Alma Mater! "William & Mary loved of old, hark upon the gale! Hear the thunder of our chorus! Alma Mater hail! Cheers! — Matthew

Matthew Blanchard
mblanchard79@yahoo.com
mblanchard2002@wmalumni.com

Community Development /
Advocacy Professional
San Francisco Bay Area
[January 13 at 08:32AM]

Matthew Blanchard,
"W&M Featured on Today as Princeton Review Best Value!: Comments"
LinkedIn® College of William and Mary Alumni Network,
(January 13, 2009). Retrieved on January 23, 2009 at 12:50AM PST.
In responding to David Brin's comment, I sought to promote a sense of pride in him that seemed he was lacking, but also to be realistic, by explaining my experience coming to the West Coast and witnessing the diminished, often ignored reputation of The College of William & Mary amongst employers. For graduate & post-graduate institutions of education, I believe that the reputation still holds. Let's hope! For I do intend on continuing my education sometime in the next few years. Alas, my remarks went mostly unconsidered by proceding commentators, as they continued to thrash the College for the divisive changes that have taken place over the last ten or twenty years. Still some people had positive remarks to share, and I appreciate them. What follows is a sampling of some of the comments from this news article posting.
There are now programs in place to allow anyone who gets good grades at VA community colleges to attend The College after a year or 2 and come out with a degree marked "William and Mary". I think that fundamental change has cheapened the degree in a sense.

Not to generalize or to sound arrogant by any means, but some of those students who have taken advantage of said program have a distinctly different level of academic capability which is noticeable to their classmates. This is especially noticeable in such a setting as team-oriented business school courses.

I've heard this fear echoed by my fellow classmates and maybe I'll be one of the few who actually brings it up at the risk of being labeled an elitist or intolerant, non-PC, or something else along those lines.


Christopher Crook,
"W&M Featured on Today as Princeton Review Best Value!: Comments"
LinkedIn® College of William and Mary Alumni Network Group,
(January 13, 2009). Retrieved on January 23, 2009 at 01:06AM PST.

I am an alumnus from the class of 1990 and I spent 6 1/2 years on the faculty. I was surprised at how little had changed at the College between 1990 and 2002 -- the time from when I graduated and the time I began as an Assistant Professor. The biggest thing that changed is that grades became inflated. My colleagues tell me that the average GPA went up by about .3. From teaching in the School of Education I found there really were no academic standards to speak of -- when we on the faculty are told that 90% of the grades on the School of Ed are As, where are the standards?

"Best Value" is no great honor though. It is code language for being way underfunded, at least compared to most other colleges. That was another big change between 1990 and 2002. The state funded roughly 60 some percent of W&M's budget in 1990. It now funds somewhere around 19% or so. The big shift occured when Jim Gilmore decided it was a good idea to cut taxes and freeze tuition at all Virginia Colleges. In all honesty I believe that decades from now when we all look back at the history of the College we will see that as the beginning of the fall of the College from which we never recovered. Believe it or not, I'm an optimist. I'm also pragmatic. When you freeze tuition for 4 years, you can't keep a strong institution moving forward. Other institutions moved forward nationwide. We stayed still, then a bad economy hit, then we had a presidency filled with turmoil and questionable financial management.

The College became much more diverse while I was there as a faculty member. You could literally watch it happen. I view that as a great thing. I don't agree with many of the sentiments expressed in the messages that come before my post. I think W&M has been enhanced by the added diversity provided by all students who are admitted during the regular admission and transfer student admission process.

I will say that I got tired of being lied to at W&M by administrators who kept saying "we will raise faculty salaries to the 60th percentile of our peer group" and seeing our salaries continue to drop and reside somewhere in the 30th percentile or there abouts. I don't use the word lie lightly. They knew we wouldn't get there. They even told us of a plan to raise salaries a few percent a year for a few years to get up to 60% -- assuming every other school would stay flat. An insult to our intelligence.

So after I received tenure I did a national job search and left. Was it due to salary? No. But more competitive salary would have helped. One of the sad things about change at William and Mary right now is that faculty are leaving. I saw them leave each year, and more and more keep leaving. And to be quite honest, many who are replacing them are not nearly as reputable as those who are leaving. I had many reasons to take an offer elsewhere -- work climate pushed me out and a great offer pulled me in to a great place. Were I one person it wouldn't matter. What concerns me is that many faculty are leaving and that is one of the things I do remember about my William and Mary experience -- great faculty. We've reached the point that good ones have left and continue to leave. The financial situation has been so bad for so long and morale among so many faculty so bad that getting top people to come teach at W&M is not going to be the easy task it once was.

Are there things about W&M that are special? Of course. Are there memories that we as alums can always cherish? Definitely! Has W&M changed? Without a doubt. Some of these changes have made it a better place. Others have been beyond the institution's control. Others have just been bad choices. In the end, W&M will always be a good institution. Pragmatically speaking, I honestly believe as a scholar of higher education administration that we've seen our best days.

John Foubert, Ph.D.,
"W&M Featured on Today as Princeton Review Best Value!: Comments"
LinkedIn® College of William and Mary Alumni Network Group,
(January 11, 2009). Retrieved on January 23, 2009 at 01:19AM PST.

Wow! I did not think that I would be hearing so much negativity as I am from this crowd.

I have the benefit of my in-laws living in W'burg so I have witnessed the transformation gradually as it was happening since I graduated in 1995. What we have at The College now are World Class facilities sprinkled into a still very accessible campus community that is actually smaller and more focused with the elimination of the Dillard residence complex.

The caliber of students are still the same, it is just the dorms have been upgraded, the new Graduate School of Business looks and will behave like a Top 50 program is supposed to, and the individual schools have been given the right tools and buildings equal to the caliber of the professors. Let's be honest here - new campus was really sore on the eyes in comparison to the rest of Old and Ancient campus and the upgrades have have transformed really tired and crummy PPE.

What has been dismissed or understated with the former comments is the dynamic change that has happened since most of us were there. We have witnessed a complete revolution in regard to IT / IP / and access to information. The world has become completely global and the way that William and Mark has to market, yes I said market, and position itself among other world class institutions has changed. The upgrades and modifications were necessary to continue to draw the best teaching faculty (no offense to the previous post) and students we have come to expect from William & Mary.

Lastly, in regard to reputation, I live and work in the Mid Atlantic / Greater NYC area and whenever anyone hears I went to W&M they all say what a great place it is and how tough it is to get into. Regarding the transfer students (from what I hear - still aren't that many)...W&M and CNU have always had a deal to allow transfers and unless things have changed, the workload and the demands of the W&M professors are still ridiculous. So, if those individuals are able to do well enough their Junior and Senior years to graduate - they deserve the same benefits as any other graduate.

I have to say that, coupled with the continued success of its graduates, all of the effort that William & Mary has been going though the last 10+ years has only increased the value of our degree. Based on the passion, well thought out and the well written responses - The College has done a bang up job.

Larry B.,
"W&M Featured on Today as Princeton Review Best Value!: Comments"
LinkedIn® College of William & Mary Alumni Network Group,
(January 10, 2009). Retrieved on January 23, 2009 at 01:36AM PST.

I was particularly struck by the former faculty member and alumni of the College, who commented on the decline of faculty standards and affairs at the W&M. Below are my final remarks to date. I'm curious to know of the Gene Nichol debacle that was mentionned in a comment that might not be cited here, so I ask for more information on that topic in my final comment. I also beg the commentators and any viewers of the article link to maintain and I guess, in a way, salvage their sense of pride in the College of William & Mary, for the University is still a sterling, stalwart institution with a distinct history and set of traditions and still yet a focus toward the future in its present administration.

My primary intention in posting this news article link to the LinkedIn® College of William and Mary Alumni Network Group Discussion Board, viewable only to members of the group, was to promote and encourage a sense of pride and respect and faith in the reputation, standards, traditions and history of our College. I hope I was able to acheive that in my commentary.

It's taken me about two weeks to return to this discussion and to view the previous comments, and I am also struck with a deep and wounding blow by the negativity that everyone has expressed in their remarks on the dynamic changes instituted at the College in the last ten or twenty years, and that's coming from someone who has already spoken of the diminished reputation of the College on the West Coast.

I'm not familiar with the Gene Nichol debacle, so I can't comment on how the issues there have affected the standards and stature of the College. Would someone kindly inform me of who Nichol is and what he has done to negatively affect the College.

Is change always progress? That's what I believe these comments asks of us all. I haven't been back to the College since I graduated in 2002, so I have no experience with how the College has transformed in the last 7 years, but I hope that the transformations have been positive, despite the economic crisis the country faces and that in due affects W&M administration. I'm glad to hear of facility improvements, which when I was a student at the College were already all long over due.

I must say that I find it quite a shame what the former W&M faculty member and alum had to say about that state of affairs for faculty administration at the College. I have noticed that many of my most beloved and well-reputed professors form the College have left in recent years, going on to change their institution of employment or their career focus entirely. This disappoints me tremendously!

I hate to see the College suffer in that way! And I wish that economically, W&M could afford remunerating their prodigious, elite faculty and candidates for tenure with higher, more competitive salaries. They truly deserve it! We all know that! Perhaps with more private funding in future years, the College will be able to improve the standards of faculty salaries while also improving facilities and maintaining a strong financial aid system.

These are just hopes for progress! Change can happen in so a many ways, from the most minute, quotidian swaying of traditions, to the birth of new monumental edifices and classrooms of learning, dining halls or dormitories. I just wish for the best! And I believe that is what the current administration of the College is striving for: positive, progressive change in full respect of our hardy traditions and stalwart, immense history!!

I wasn't expecting such vehemently negative responses to this news article I posted, and I appreciate the positive remarks immensely. I hope that despite the negativity that herein lays, we all still are able to hold a true sense of pride in our Alma Mater. That was my true intention when I posted the news article originally.

Please inform me on the Gene Nichol issue! And I'd love to hear in more detail of how the College has developed its facilities in the last seven years.

Thanks to everyone who has responded to this news article. I appreciate hearing all of your comments. They have helped broaden my perspective on the College as a relatively recent alum. I still only wish that W&M had quite nearly the same reputation on the West Coast as it does on the East Coast amongst employers. Kudos to you all for sharing so thoughtfully on the the topic! Cheers! — Matthew

Matthew Blanchard
mblanchard79@yahoo.com
mblanchard2002@wmalumni.com
Community Development /
Advocacy Professional
San Francisco Bay Area
[01.22.2009 @ 11:36PM PST]

Matthew Blanchard,
"W&M Featured on Today as Princeton Review Best Value!: Comments"
LinkedIn® College of William and Mary Alumni Network Group,
(January 22, 2009). Retrieved on January 23, 2009 at 01:48AM PST.

13 January 2009

"An Escape Hatch for a Troubled Intellect!"

The following is the text from an email thread dialogue I am continue to have with a former Facebook™ Friend: Jeff Parker. I am entering this text into my blog as a public record of this insightful, illuminating correspondence. I hope that in sharing these words with my followers, I might impart a sense of the divine purpose that I feel having been bestowed upon me by God (or a Higher Power) in light of my death-defying, tragic illness and injury.  
 
I sincerely hope as well that Jeff doesn't have any qualms with me making this dialogue public. I do so in a way to honor him, for "the fragments of Enlightenment" that we have shared with one another through written conversation. First is the text that Jeff Parker wrote me in response to my Facebook™ Email message (see blog entry: "An Irreverent, Licentious Remark on God!"), and then you will find the long, tedious, rambling remarks that I wrote to him just this evening on Facebook™. 

JEFF PARKER'S FACEBOOK™ MESSAGE TO ME:

Hi Matthew,
Divine faith is neither. It is an escape hatch for a troubled intellect. I believe only in Science and curiosity. Only science can achieve the sublime and find universal truths. With that said, everyone's spiritual journey is different. Your's is especially challenging, but you will get through it. Do whatever works for you, but know that Science is your friend. The pastors & priests make promises for some future paradise, some with good intentions, some with cynical and corrupt motives.

Let them take care of your spirt until your body is healed, and even cured, by Science, as mine was. I am amazed every day by the beauty of the natural world around me. Heaven is here right now. Don't miss it. And know that I wish you the best.

RE: MERRY CHRISTMAS & HAPPY HOLIDAYS! Email Correspondance.
Jeff Parker, Facebook™; January 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM.
Retrieved on January 13, 2009 at 03:17 AM.
MY RESPONSE TO JEFF PARKER'S FACEBOOK® MESSAGE:
Jeff, I'm sorry to regret having sent you these preachy, pious and proselytizing emails which only provoke your atheism and rational faith in Science, while making me sound like a completely ignorant, brain-washed ascetic. I want you to know that I do also very much believe in Science as the ultimate source for universal truths and healing.

While I have in the past year tired to open myself up to my faith,
believing that both it and Science are not a diametrically opposed binary but instead work cohesively together in broadening our understanding of humankind and all things greater than the human intellect, I have at the same time completely abandoned myself to the process of healing though Science.

Science can answer many questions on the mysteries of life,
but there are some questions, I believe, that cannot be answered through Science. That's why we have Faith and Religion—to answer the greater preponderances of the human intellect. Major, predominant, contemporary philosophical theories of a Supreme Being and the Divine argue this same thesis.

I agree with you, as I've said, that Science can lead us to
many universal truths, but I do not want to be misled to put all my faith excludively into Science; especially now, during my time of immense struggle, discovery and reawakening. I am not a born again Christian. I have been saved not figuratively in the Evangelical sense of the word, but literally both by the miracles of Science and by the miracles of God. Or so I choose to believe!

This, my mutually respective, combined faith in Science and in God,
has allowed me to develop a deeper sense of faith in Myself, believing out of circumstance and necessity, that since I have survived death-defying, brutal illness and injury, then I must have a certain calling or purpose in this life that is yet unacheived and still ahead of me to be accomplished and bestowed upon me by a greater being or power that has some important impact on and influence over how the World works.

Is it wrong, in your opinion, to believe that I am meant for
something greater, something special, because I have survived? Science doesn't seem to answer the or'looming questions of human intentions, actions and purpose in life. Or, at least, no Science that I have been introduced to answers those questions. If you know of any secular, scientific teaching that could enlighten me as to my purpose in life, please indulge me with the answer!

For now, I'll continue to uphold my faith both in the Divine and in Science,
as both will strengthen me in different ways (some physical/tangible and others more abstract/spiritual) and allow me to heal and to survive. Please, do not judge me any less of a person because I hold my faith in the Divine close to my heart, because I am also and equally a firm believer in the miracles, mysteries and mayhem of Science.

In that way, I agree with you! You might be right in saying
(although, I'd be hellbent on defending myself against the accusation, if I weren't the victim and survivor of such unspeakable tragedy) that I, like many, use Faith as "an escape hatch for a troubled intellect." I have sought such escape on after falling to an unfathomable low, having my life threatened and saved by Science and by God. And after having my perceptions of the world, my perspective, drastically changed and challenged, flipped upside down onto its dirty underbelly, weak and vulnerable to intimidations of outside forces.

My spiritual journey is "especially challenging!" I ask you though,
in admitting this, to not take my faith for granted and denigrate it with awful, licentious remarks.

I have never talked to my priest (or rather, my priest has never
discussed with me) about any "promise for some future paradise." He doesn't mention some ulterior, celestial heaven; but instead, he talks to me about demonstrating God's love though our good intentions, actions and experiences with others and about thereby creating a degree or amount or experience of Heaven on Earth: "Heaven is here right now!"

And my priest has yet to answer all my questions and resolve all my doubts.
For example, I still wonder how, if God is this blessed, divine, all powerful and eminently/entirely loving being, he could have allowed for this awful tragedy to befall me. Why has he allowed for such great sufferance in my short, young life (delusions, disease, dysfunction, and disfigurement)?

If my faith cannot answer these questions, then I still don't see Science
readily offering me any answers or affirmations of life well-lived and good health deserved. Just as much as Faith is a source of great doubt in my life, Science will always be, in my mind, the harbinger of death and disease, not Enlightenment or Salvation. I'll tell you...I'd be a Buddhist, if only I knew enough about that religion to follow their belief system.

My priest does not have "cynical and corrupt motives."
He is a well-intentioned, kindhearted, blessed man who only wants to provide me with absolution of my trespasses, assurances of my forward path in Faith, and affirmations of my life and of my miraculous survival/salvation: redemption and reward and recompense in God and in Science.

Finally, in closing, I ask why have you canceled our friend connection on Facebook™? Is it simply because you so wholeheartedly disagree with and were offended by my reverent proselytizing or do you have ulterior motives? I would very much like to have you as a Facebook™ connection, so that we can stay up-to-date on and informed of developments in each others' lives, and because frankly... honestly... truly, I do very much enjoy and benefit from our interactions and correspondence.

Still however, I do not want to be such a burden or offense to you.
I just hope that we both can continue to enjoy the beautiful fragments of Enlightenment that we gain from each others in our binary, opposed perspectives on the world. Please, re-accept my invitation to connect on Facebook™, as I would be very grateful to call you a Friend. I want to continue a dialogue with you and hope that you would be interested to know periodically of how I am doing (as I would of you!).

Please, let this be an continuation of our conversation,
another jumping off point and not a final, abrupt end to our cyber-interactions. Indulge me, please! Invite me in! Talk to me and continue to share your wisdom with me. I am many times over a better person for what I have gained and will gain from our experience corresponding together.

As always, thank you for reading this email and for offering me
your time and attention. Thank you for being willing to consider my thoughts as legitimate and sane and not as merely "an escape hatch for a trouble intellect." And thank you for responding thoughtfully to my remarks! God Speed! Peac Out! Blessings! Until some time soon...


Your Friend,

Matt(e)o | QHereKidSF


P.S., Onto a tangent, I digress: Are you familiar with LinkedIn®,
the professional development and networking web service that connects colleagues and classmates though effect and active Internet linkages? Well, if you are not familiar with it, then I encourage you to set up a profile and to connect with me directly there as a member of the College of William & Mary Alumni Network Group.

My public LinkedIn® profile URL is
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewblanchard/. From there, you will be able to set up an account of your own and request a connection with me.
Matthew Blanchard's LinkedIn® Profile

Matthew Blanchard's Facebook profile

http://qherekidsf.blogspot.com/
http://www.bebo.com/qherekidsf/
http://www.myspace.com/qherekidsf/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewblanchard/
http://www.pandora.com/people/mblanchard79/
http://www.wmalumni.com/member/mblanchard2002/

THE GREAT ENEMY OF TRUTH IS VERY OFTEN NOT
THE LIE, DELIBERATE, CONTRIVED AND DISHONEST,
BUT THE MYTH, PERSISTENT, PERSUASIVE AND UNREALISTIC.
— John F. Kennedy

SI ON SAIT EXACTEMENT CE QU'ON VA FAIRE,
À QUOI BON LE FAIRE?
If we know exactly what we are going to do,
What's the good of doing it?
— Pablo Picasso

An Escape Hatch for a Troubled Intellect! Email Correspondence.
Matthew Blanchard, Facebook™; January 13, 2009 at 3:04 AM.
Retrieved on January 13, 2009 at 3:24 AM.